10 responses so far ↓

• 1 Jason Dec 17, 2009 at 1:12 PM

  Terrence, thanks a bunch for taking the time to respond. We do use the graphical view a lot (our designers) but our programmers obviously do not. If I chose to put a programmer into the builder, would things still play nice with other DW deisgners? It seems it would. Obviously, my answers revolve more around with compatibility. It seems the builder would offer the programmer a thicker toolset while allowing the designers who do minimal javascript and jQuery continue to be in DW. Thanks again, Jason

• 2 Jas Panesar Dec 17, 2009 at 1:29 PM

  Thanks for making that chart..! It certainly put it in perspective for me.. I have Bern enjoying cfeclipse and had no idea what I was missing out on. Downloading it now. Also eclipse has a decent enough inline browser preview that it can ease the need for a wysiwyg on the "what does this look like" end of things.

• 3 Kumar Dec 17, 2009 at 1:48 PM

  Eclipse Plugin's repository allows you to achieve features related to web development (HTML, CSS, Javascript, coding plugins).
  
  Ultimately, IMO, one should let programmers code in what environment they feel most comfortable in. If someone can write their best code in notepad, then notepad it is for them.

• 4 Steven Erat Dec 17, 2009 at 2:10 PM

  Homesite has Custom CFML Code Assist. This was useful for makers of CF_CustomTags. The author would make a custom VTM for adding code hinting support for the custom tag, to be imported by the Homesite User. I did this in the first Custom Tag I published on the Allaire Exchange.

• 5 Steven Erat Dec 17, 2009 at 2:23 PM

  Also, I really take advantage of custom tool bar icons in HomeSite. I can make custom palettes with a particular series of buttons so that I can use them in a particular order as needed. One example is that I would create a cftry, cfcatch, cfdump, cfabort series of buttons on a palette, then if I needed to I could just click down the row to facilitate some troubleshooting code sessions. Now CFEclipse and CFB have buttons too, but I don't know if its possible to customize and organize them.
  
  BTW, I still encounter people using CF Studio, which did have CFML debugging, although if used with post-MX versions that debugging won't work. (Presently I'm also working with a customer running CF4.5.1 SP2)

• 6 John Dec 18, 2009 at 11:28 AM

  That's all well and good, but *when* is CFBuilder going to be release, and *how much* is it going to cost? I need to plan next year's budget and if I can't do it soon, CFBuilder purchases will have to wait.

• 7 Charlie Arehart Apr 1, 2010 at 12:31 AM

  Hey Terry, was an updated version of the chart above ever created? I thought it was on the Adobe site but couldn't find it looking on the CFB page (http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/cfbuilder/features/). I'm sure others may find this older entry in the future (as I did searching for a comparison of the editors), so a point to any updated chart would be much appreciated. Thanks for doing it.

• 8 Gel Jun 17, 2010 at 2:01 PM

  So basically all CF Builder needs is a Design View (WYSIWYG) and it will make sense for those of us that use Dreamweaver.
  
  Cool.
  
  When's it getting the Design View?
  
  ;-)

• 9 tpryan Jun 17, 2010 at 2:56 PM

  @Gel, it's not. If you like Dreamweaver, and like the design view feature, use it. You can still develop ColdFusion with it.

• 10 John Klahan Jun 29, 2010 at 6:57 PM

  Thank you for the comparison chart., It's so far so good.

Leave a Comment